Empowering the Agricultural Supply Chain
The Platform measures the impact of farm management practices on 8 sustainability metrics: Biodiversity, Energy Use, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Irrigation Water Use, Land Use, Soil Carbon, Soil Conservation and Water Quality. To learn more about how these metrics are calculated, please visit our Metrics Documentation.
The following models are used as the backbone for the Fieldprint Platform’s eight sustainability indicators:
For mor information on how these models work and impact our eight sustainability indicators, please see our metrics documentation website.
All eight indicators are calculated simultaneously. The Platform cannot calculate one indicator separately because much of the data a user enters is used for multiple calculations. For example, to determine Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Energy Use must first be calculated. In irrigated fields, irrigation water use affects the amount of energy consumed, which then affects the amount of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide emitted as a result.
Ultimately, yes; however, to credibly communicate the environmental impacts of agronomic changes, Field to Market has established protocols regarding the use of results from the Fieldprint Platform. These protocols include requiring organizations to join Field to Market and registering a Fieldprint Project.
See Table 4, Fieldprint Platform v5 Sources, using this documentation webpage. The soil carbon stock changes component is a positive value (sources) when emissions are estimated, and a negative value (sinks) when the model estimates carbon sequestration. N2O emissions are not a sink; the model always estimates some N2O emissions. N2O emissions are highly influenced by applications of synthetic fertilizer and manure, and by crop residue amounts after crop harvest. N2O emissions are attributed to the crop that received the nutrient applications.
Project benchmarks are only available to be used by Fieldprint Projects. A Project Benchmark is the average Fieldprint metric value for all fields within a specific project that share the same scope (such as crop type or irrigation). These benchmarks are more meaningful to growers because they reflect results from others in the same region and project. They are calculated as weighted averages of field-level data, which can be area weighted, or production weighted.
National and state benchmarks take publicly available data from USDA for crop production information related to inputs (nutrients, pesticides), outputs (yield), and we create a production profile based on irrigation type (irrigated, non-irrigated). We average five years of data (2008-2012, inclusive) and estimate the metrics using weighted averages at the national and state level.
In 2025, we released a major update to our models for energy use, GHG emissions, and soil carbon. The new models incorporate new sources of energy use and GHG emissions, along with a complete refresh of all impact factors. However, as of July 2026, the current state and national benchmarks have not been updated yet; they are a rollover from the previous version of the Calculator’s models. Because of this, comparing new results to the old benchmarks might be off. We plan to release updated national benchmarks later in 2026 and are still working on the methodology for the state benchmarks.
Currently, the Fieldprint Platform can produce analysis for certain crops grown in the contiguous United States.
We are constantly expanding our portfolio to meet member needs. Adding a new commodity crop involves a rigorous process to ensure your sustainability metrics are robust.
The process includes developing crop-specific data references, updating our modeling architecture, and ensuring alignment with soil carbon and soil erosion models.
Members can fund these additions through a combination of annual dues and supplemental project funding. We also encourage multiple organizations to partner and invest jointly so as to make these Fieldprint Platform improvements more cost-effective for all interested parties.
Please contact our team to discuss the timeline and technical requirements for your specific commodity.
We recommend creating scenarios in the Calculator to estimate your own localized benchmarks. You can construct these scenarios using state publications and available USDA survey data for yield, nutrients, tillage, and irrigation.
The Fieldprint Platform is available for anyone to use, free of charge at calculator.fieldtomarket.org. The tool is also available through qualified data management partners, embedded as a value-added service to their farm management software. Some of these data partners may charge a fee to access their software.
Entering data for the first time could take from 30 minutes to 1.5 hours per field, depending on the complexity of the farm management practices; users report that completing a crop interval for a field gets much easier with practice. The calculations themselves are typically completed within a minute or two.
While Field to Market does not provide data entry assistance, we do support Fieldprint Project Administrators and Implementation Partners as they work with individual growers. We offer Platform training sessions for Field to Market members, provide demos of the Platform for organizations looking to join Field to Market and maintain a support website that helps walk growers through the data entry process. Please see data entry support in User Support section of this website.
Though the tool is free and publicly available, organizations must join Field to Market to access all data and project management features, and to get direct support from Field to Market staff. General information regarding why sustainability matters for each indicator and how to improve your score are generated for each Fieldprint Analysis.
The FSA is a global sustainability assessment developed by SAI Platform and used by food and drink companies to evaluate on-farm performance across environmental, social, and economic practices. The Fieldprint® Platform has been benchmarked against the FSA and is aligned to FSA Gold Level, the highest possible rating. Growers in a Fieldprint Project that has enabled the Equivalency Module can go a step further and earn verified FSA Bronze, Silver, or Gold for their project by answering a 22-question module in addition to the Fieldprint Analysis they already complete. See SAI Platform Alignment for the full picture.
The Fieldprint Platform does not have field size restrictions. However, we do want to note that the Energy Use and GHG Emission metrics might produce unexpected results when a field is under 1 hectare or 2.5 acres in size.
SWAT+ can simulate processes such as soil carbon dynamics, surface runoff, infiltration, evapotranspiration, groundwater flow, sediment transport, and nutrient cycling. When coupled with additional calibration and validation against observed data, it aligns with the IPCC’s definition of a Tier 3 methodology. Tier 3 models are characterized by their comprehensive approaches, disaggregation of activity data, and the use of the latest scientific knowledge to provide granular estimates of variables of interest such as greenhouse gas emissions and removals.
By the end of 2025, Fieldprint Platform V5 will incorporate the SWAT+ model, which Colorado State University will validate to simulate soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics in the U.S. Corn Belt. This model validation effort focuses on cropping systems that include corn, soybeans, and wheat, among other crops, which collectively comprise 92% of the Field to Market’s project acres. The SWAT+ model implementation by CSU will provide a calibrated model service with localized weather, soil properties, and crop growth modules. Modeling of SOC dynamics for other crops and/or regions outside the Midwest will rely on parameters from the USDA ARS National Agroecosystems Model, built-in parameters, and parameters from the scientific literature. Model uncertainty quantification will be provided for crops and regions with sufficient data.
The model output from SWAT+ should be considered sufficient for Scope 3 reporting.
Generation of carbon credits by SWAT+ is not currently supported.
The GHG Protocol does not have a mechanism to formally approve tools or models in the sense of a certification, recognition, or endorsement program. However, guidance from the GHG Protocol played a significant role in the development of the Fieldprint Platform Version 5. At a later date, Field to Market will release a report describing how output from SWAT+ can be used to align with GHG Protocol Land Sector and Removals Guidance. For additional context, the “Built on GHG Protocol” recognition was officially closed on August 13, 2024.
This is a planned feature. There are two short notes in the Soil Carbon documentation about this:
The Fieldprint Platform uses an inventory approach rather than an intervention approach to account for GHG emissions and soil carbon impacts. It is important to note that Fieldprint API data partners can eventually develop intervention approaches with the Fieldprint Platform by creating counterfactual scenarios.
Roughly in order of impact, the largest contributors typically are:
Yes, inputs can be filtered by indicator or seen all at once here.
The historical crop interval screener is designed to appear only once, when a new field is created. Once completed, it cannot be triggered again. The only way to re-access the screener is to delete the field and add a new record. If you leave the field unfinished, the screener will remain accessible until it is submitted.
Yes, intensity-based metrics (metrics based on crop production output, like per bushel) look better with higher yield values. However, it is important to evaluate both dimensions: look at indicators expressed per area (e.g., lb CO2e / acre) as well as per production output (e.g., lb CO2e / lb of crop output). Reviewing both ensures you do not mask an increased use of inputs that might have been required to achieve those higher yields.